4 Comments
User's avatar
Defy the Odds's avatar

You gave me an idea and i write a post about it, but the important thing is this:

You neet a trendline break and an accumulation phase where the market wont go down if a bad news comes. And finally you need a trigger event when the majority of investors says at the same time: oh yeah this is.

In the beginning of 2023, you had a trendline break an accumulation phase for a few month and cpi was declining for a few month. And then you had a bad nfp and ism service data and everybody new at the samw time that the inflation problem is solved.

The same goes for smaller correction. Usually you have a reason for a correction, so for finding the bottom you need a counternews which negates it.

I approach this that way.

Keong's avatar

Thanks very much for sharing

AlphaDoc's avatar

Completely agree with your thesis and that most investors are caught looking elsewhere. I have also posted about this but from a more philosophical view (closer to fundamentals). My guides. 1. Charlie Munger “show me the incentives and I’ll show you the results” < Big Money and market makers are incentivized to get people to invest no matter what; 2. Crist on Value analogue, that investing (like horse betting) is a parimutuel endeavor, to win you must pick NOT the best investment (horse) but the investment (horse) most mispriced to win. Also the market makers/Big Money always collects its vig (wins no matter what) and a zero sum game for everyone else. 3. Play the (biggest) Player: like at a poker table, levels of thought to figure out what Big Money is thinking as they move the market.

Keong's avatar

Great article. How would you go about thinking that markets have bottomed ? Flipping whatever makes markets or stock overvalued does not equate to undervalued.